Solutions / Agentic Engineering

LLM-assisted internal tools need engineering discipline, not experiments without ownership.

We help teams use agentic engineering to build internal tools, codify repeatable workflows, and support engineering work without bypassing the processes that keep corporate environments safe.

The useful work is rarely the model choice alone. It is deciding which workflow should exist, what the tool is allowed to do, where humans review outputs, and how quality is measured before the tool becomes part of daily work.

Where it helps

Useful agentic work starts with a bounded workflow

  • Internal tools for engineering, support, operations, or platform teams
  • LLM-assisted maintenance workflows for large or unfamiliar codebases
  • Developer-support agents that follow existing process and review gates
  • Knowledge retrieval over internal documentation and engineering decisions
  • Automation around triage, runbooks, deployment checks, and routine analysis

Guardrails

The process matters as much as the tool

  • Clear ownership for every workflow and output
  • Defined human review points before production-impacting actions
  • Data-handling notes for sensitive repositories, tickets, and documents
  • Evaluation criteria before a workflow is treated as useful
  • Documentation that explains how the tool should and should not be used

Packages

Start with a scoped workflow, then expand only if it proves useful

Agentic Engineering Enablement

For teams that want LLM-assisted internal tools and engineering workflows with clear ownership, review gates, and corporate-safe guidelines.

8000-18 000€
depending on workflow scope

Timeline: 2-5 weeks

Time & Material Consultation

Hourly, weekly, or monthly consultation and continuous work for long-term contracts. Prices are per expert needed based on seniority.

100-200€
per hour
4000-6000€
per week
10 000-15 000€
per month

FAQ

What does agentic engineering mean here?

It means using LLMs, agents, and automation to support real engineering workflows while keeping ownership, review gates, and process boundaries explicit.

Is this only for startups?

No. The service is also meant for corporate environments where internal tools must respect existing guidelines, approvals, security constraints, and auditability.

Do you build the tool or only advise?

Both are possible. A typical engagement starts with workflow discovery and ends with either a working internal tool, implementation guidance, or a scoped adoption plan.